Most of us have known the answer for a very long time. Why would they do that? You're the best person to ask this question and you undoubtedly know the answer. Do _actually_ think any corporation would hesitate to have anything "anti"-them eliminated, especially in a country without effective law? The biggest company in the world (the US) literally cultivates mass murder in Mexico (and Colombia) over drugs. Given that any corporation makes money, and are the sole financiers of the marketing industry (multi-billion dollar industry in the US alone) is tantamount to admitting that the Corporate game is to lie and cheat to the legal extent possible, and beyond. To be blunt, for you to come right out and say "I am a marketing & advertising guy" is to say "I find ways to get people to believe things that aren't true - that things about (product X or situation Y) are better than they really are. Quoting Leonardo: Welcome to South America. Union business has always been a risky and violent business, and both ways, I must say. Even the paramilitary and/or the guerrilla could have been blackmailing the union leaders to get their cuts. Not a single piece of evidence! And many other possible scenarios not even considered: other suspects can be the bottlers, the large intermediaries, and even other companies that don't want any union to succeed and set an example for their own workers. He just wants fame and money.īelieving the The Coca-Cola Company would risk all they got involving themselves in murderer, does not make any sense at all. The only real intention of the lawyer is to force an agreement and receive his huge chunky cut! He doesn't care about the Colombian workers. And not very well done job: it is too obvious! I can tell you that everything in this documentary, every word, every image, is designed with the only aim of raising public pressure against Coca-Cola.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |